|
|
|
Bonnie Elster of Clark Wilson LLP with
associates (from left) Veronica P. Franco, Warren G.
Brazier, Amy A. Mortimore, Adam I. Zasada, and
Keri T. Grenier, photo by Alistair Eagle Click here
to see full sized version. |
A U.S.-based survey of the legal profession recently found
that while law firms expected their associates to have
advanced client development skills, 57 per cent of firms
failed to provide them with the training that they would need
to possess these skills.
This survey, conducted by the LawMarketing Portal and Sage
Professional Development Institute, included respondents from
Canada, Mexico, the U.K., Australia and the U.S. And it
covered the entire gamut of firms — from solo practices to a
firm with a whopping 2,500 lawyers.
The results raise the concern: Are firms in Canada
expecting their associates to play too much of a role in
growing their business and acquiring clients without providing
the necessary training? The practice of law has become
increasingly competitive; the client is getting more
sophisticated and demanding; the bar is going up. Now the need
for associates to bring in business is imperative for most
practices to succeed.
“The marketplace has changed significantly,” said Bonnie
Elster, a partner with the British Columbia-based Clark Wilson
LLP. “Since our associates are all coming out with the same
legal skills, we need that much more to satisfy clients.”
Elster said there can’t be expectations placed on
associates without having the right training. Her firm sees it
as its responsibility, and to that end, “We have a skills
training program in place as part and parcel of our obligation
to associates,” she said.
“Successful firms are figuring out client needs even the
client didn’t know [about] and the complacent law firm is
going to lose its shirt,” said Gerry Riskin, a Canadian lawyer
and co-founder of The Edge Group, which specializes in law
firm management. He concurs that expectations are too high and
associates need training.
“Associates are coming in with no client development skills
and learning by the seat of their pants,” Riskin explained.
His company helps lawyers learn how to acquire skills that
range from how to listen to their clients needs to managing
client expectations. “For instance, most lawyers are petrified
at the thought of asking a client for referrals; they don’t
want to act inappropriately. When it comes to referrals,
Riskin can help lawyers to ask while maintaining their dignity
and without looking hungry.
“Preparation for asking for referrals is behavioural (i.e.,
how do I raise this comfortably) and takes practice.
Strategically, the lawyer needs to identify a reason for
seeking the referral that is true and will make sense to the
client. Such a reason goes well beyond mere hunger for
more work, or worse, pure greed for more fees.
For example, a lawyer may indicate to a client she
particularly enjoys work for the client’s industry sector and
would enjoy concentrating her practice more in that direction.
She might even add that the firm is gearing up for more
capacity in the area (specialists/additional lawyers).
Accordingly, she might indicate that she would be
particularly grateful if an introduction could be made to “X”
or at the least that she be kept in mind if the client knows
of a member of the relevant trade association which is facing
challenges similar to the client’s. She will then go on
to make it clear to the client how such a referral would
actually be made,” Riskin said.
Unless lawyers have practised for a few years, they haven’t
a context to use business skills such as those pertaining to
billing and retainers. “Most associates think that when you
bill, the client just pays,” said Riskin. “They don’t know
what a sand trap is; they are just walking on the green behind
Tiger Woods.”
But the good news is that, according to Riskin, lawyers are
the easiest of professionals to train. “It is a joy to watch
associates acquire skills because the law teaches you to grasp
concepts and so they get it fast,” he said.
The key is to practise, just like any skill. In a perfect
world, Riskin advises that associates attend education
programs. “Take a golfing lesson; you are already on the golf
course,” he said. Failing that, there are many books on the
subject.
An important factor of the training program is evaluation.
Elster asks associates for continual feedback but this isn’t
an easy task. “The business of law is very demanding and it is
one more demand on their non-billable time,” she says.” But
overall, associates realize it is time well-spent and
recognize they need the training.”
Thelma O’Grady is manager of professional development at
Bull, Housser & Tupper LLP in Vancouver and former
director of programs at CLE in British Columbia. “Associates
were fearful about asking how they were supposed to bring new
clients to the firm,” she said, “so I developed a training
program around business development with the full support of
the executive.” O’Grady had an outside speaker help create a
business plan and she created sessions where partners and
senior associates speak individually about what they do.
According to O’Grady, the big firms have been thinking
about formal training for the past decade. “Now there are
about eight firms in Vancouver that have hired full- or
part-time professional developers,” she added.
As well, O’Grady has formed a loose-knit organization
called The Professional Development Network. “About 20
people from other law firms get together four to six times a
year to discuss issues and share ideas.”
O’Grady believes that the U.S. surveys are a message to
firms to recruit and maintain good talent, “Because good
associates will go where they get good training and we want to
keep them in the firm.”
Associate training is a win-win opportunity for all. And in
the end, clients will be happier, which in turn produces more
revenue!
|